Fail-closed authorization
Expired, invalid, missing or insufficient identity and authority evidence does not silently downgrade into approval.
SECURITY DESIGN
SecuraVouch is designed around explicit trust boundaries rather than implicit approval from presence, urgency or a single application event.
Expired, invalid, missing or insufficient identity and authority evidence does not silently downgrade into approval.
Microsoft Teams meeting context is treated as origin evidence, not proof of physical identity or organizational authority.
Decisions and permits are bound to the protected action they were issued for, reducing approval-reuse ambiguity.
Policies can require distinct authority holders and prevent a single principal from satisfying multiple policy-distinct roles.
Authorization permits are deliberately short-lived and expire rather than remaining reusable authorization artifacts.
Structured evidence and cryptographic integrity mechanisms support later verification of assurance events.
Sensitive external meeting and participant references are protected by application-level cryptographic controls before persistence.
The Teams application does not request camera or microphone device permissions for its credential-assurance workflow.
Authentication failures are designed to emit diagnostic status without exposing raw bearer tokens in normal application logging.
SecuraVouch provides authorization assurance for configured workflows. It does not claim that collaboration-platform presence alone proves the physical identity of a person, and it does not infer authority from meeting membership. It makes no biometric, liveness, physical-presence, qualified-electronic-signature or universal deepfake-detection claim. Its research-only physical-channel experiments are not part of the current product surface.
Local automated tests exercise implemented authorization, evidence and marketplace trust boundaries. Native execution in a controlled Microsoft 365 tenant and customer-specific downstream connectors remain separate release gates. No public statement on this site should be read as a certification of a customer's configuration or regulated workflow.
Security researchers can report suspected vulnerabilities to info@securagen.ai. Please do not include passwords, bearer tokens, private keys or other live secrets in an initial report.